# SOME DESCRIPTIVE TITLE.
# Copyright (C) 2001-2016, Python Software Foundation
# This file is distributed under the same license as the Python package.
# FIRST AUTHOR <EMAIL@ADDRESS>, YEAR.
#
#, fuzzy
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: Python 3.6\n"
"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n"
"POT-Creation-Date: 2016-10-30 10:40+0100\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: YEAR-MO-DA HO:MI+ZONE\n"
"Last-Translator: FULL NAME <EMAIL@ADDRESS>\n"
"Language-Team: LANGUAGE <LL@li.org>\n"
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:5
msgid "Socket Programming HOWTO"
msgstr ""

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:7
msgid "Gordon McMillan"
msgstr ""

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:0
msgid "Abstract"
msgstr "Résumé"

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:12
msgid ""
"Sockets are used nearly everywhere, but are one of the most severely "
"misunderstood technologies around. This is a 10,000 foot overview of "
"sockets. It's not really a tutorial - you'll still have work to do in "
"getting things operational. It doesn't cover the fine points (and there are "
"a lot of them), but I hope it will give you enough background to begin using "
"them decently."
msgstr ""

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:20
msgid "Sockets"
msgstr "Interfaces de connexion (*sockets*)"

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:22
msgid ""
"I'm only going to talk about INET (i.e. IPv4) sockets, but they account for "
"at least 99% of the sockets in use. And I'll only talk about STREAM (i.e. "
"TCP) sockets - unless you really know what you're doing (in which case this "
"HOWTO isn't for you!), you'll get better behavior and performance from a "
"STREAM socket than anything else. I will try to clear up the mystery of what "
"a socket is, as well as some hints on how to work with blocking and non-"
"blocking sockets. But I'll start by talking about blocking sockets. You'll "
"need to know how they work before dealing with non-blocking sockets."
msgstr ""

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:31
msgid ""
"Part of the trouble with understanding these things is that \"socket\" can "
"mean a number of subtly different things, depending on context. So first, "
"let's make a distinction between a \"client\" socket - an endpoint of a "
"conversation, and a \"server\" socket, which is more like a switchboard "
"operator. The client application (your browser, for example) uses \"client\" "
"sockets exclusively; the web server it's talking to uses both \"server\" "
"sockets and \"client\" sockets."
msgstr ""

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:40
msgid "History"
msgstr ""

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:42
msgid ""
"Of the various forms of :abbr:`IPC (Inter Process Communication)`, sockets "
"are by far the most popular.  On any given platform, there are likely to be "
"other forms of IPC that are faster, but for cross-platform communication, "
"sockets are about the only game in town."
msgstr ""

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:47
msgid ""
"They were invented in Berkeley as part of the BSD flavor of Unix. They "
"spread like wildfire with the Internet. With good reason --- the combination "
"of sockets with INET makes talking to arbitrary machines around the world "
"unbelievably easy (at least compared to other schemes)."
msgstr ""

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:54
msgid "Creating a Socket"
msgstr ""

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:56
msgid ""
"Roughly speaking, when you clicked on the link that brought you to this "
"page, your browser did something like the following::"
msgstr ""

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:64
msgid ""
"When the ``connect`` completes, the socket ``s`` can be used to send in a "
"request for the text of the page. The same socket will read the reply, and "
"then be destroyed. That's right, destroyed. Client sockets are normally only "
"used for one exchange (or a small set of sequential exchanges)."
msgstr ""

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:70
msgid ""
"What happens in the web server is a bit more complex. First, the web server "
"creates a \"server socket\"::"
msgstr ""

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:80
msgid ""
"A couple things to notice: we used ``socket.gethostname()`` so that the "
"socket would be visible to the outside world.  If we had used ``s."
"bind(('localhost', 80))`` or ``s.bind(('127.0.0.1', 80))`` we would still "
"have a \"server\" socket, but one that was only visible within the same "
"machine.  ``s.bind(('', 80))`` specifies that the socket is reachable by any "
"address the machine happens to have."
msgstr ""

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:87
msgid ""
"A second thing to note: low number ports are usually reserved for \"well "
"known\" services (HTTP, SNMP etc). If you're playing around, use a nice high "
"number (4 digits)."
msgstr ""

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:91
msgid ""
"Finally, the argument to ``listen`` tells the socket library that we want it "
"to queue up as many as 5 connect requests (the normal max) before refusing "
"outside connections. If the rest of the code is written properly, that "
"should be plenty."
msgstr ""

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:95
msgid ""
"Now that we have a \"server\" socket, listening on port 80, we can enter the "
"mainloop of the web server::"
msgstr ""

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:106
msgid ""
"There's actually 3 general ways in which this loop could work - dispatching "
"a thread to handle ``clientsocket``, create a new process to handle "
"``clientsocket``, or restructure this app to use non-blocking sockets, and "
"multiplex between our \"server\" socket and any active ``clientsocket``\\ s "
"using ``select``. More about that later. The important thing to understand "
"now is this: this is *all* a \"server\" socket does. It doesn't send any "
"data. It doesn't receive any data. It just produces \"client\" sockets. Each "
"``clientsocket`` is created in response to some *other* \"client\" socket "
"doing a ``connect()`` to the host and port we're bound to. As soon as we've "
"created that ``clientsocket``, we go back to listening for more connections. "
"The two \"clients\" are free to chat it up - they are using some dynamically "
"allocated port which will be recycled when the conversation ends."
msgstr ""

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:121
msgid "IPC"
msgstr ""

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:123
msgid ""
"If you need fast IPC between two processes on one machine, you should look "
"into pipes or shared memory.  If you do decide to use AF_INET sockets, bind "
"the \"server\" socket to ``'localhost'``. On most platforms, this will take "
"a shortcut around a couple of layers of network code and be quite a bit "
"faster."
msgstr ""

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:129
msgid ""
"The :mod:`multiprocessing` integrates cross-platform IPC into a higher-level "
"API."
msgstr ""

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:134
msgid "Using a Socket"
msgstr ""

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:136
msgid ""
"The first thing to note, is that the web browser's \"client\" socket and the "
"web server's \"client\" socket are identical beasts. That is, this is a "
"\"peer to peer\" conversation. Or to put it another way, *as the designer, "
"you will have to decide what the rules of etiquette are for a conversation*. "
"Normally, the ``connect``\\ ing socket starts the conversation, by sending "
"in a request, or perhaps a signon. But that's a design decision - it's not a "
"rule of sockets."
msgstr ""

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:143
msgid ""
"Now there are two sets of verbs to use for communication. You can use "
"``send`` and ``recv``, or you can transform your client socket into a file-"
"like beast and use ``read`` and ``write``. The latter is the way Java "
"presents its sockets. I'm not going to talk about it here, except to warn "
"you that you need to use ``flush`` on sockets. These are buffered \"files\", "
"and a common mistake is to ``write`` something, and then ``read`` for a "
"reply. Without a ``flush`` in there, you may wait forever for the reply, "
"because the request may still be in your output buffer."
msgstr ""

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:152
msgid ""
"Now we come to the major stumbling block of sockets - ``send`` and ``recv`` "
"operate on the network buffers. They do not necessarily handle all the bytes "
"you hand them (or expect from them), because their major focus is handling "
"the network buffers. In general, they return when the associated network "
"buffers have been filled (``send``) or emptied (``recv``). They then tell "
"you how many bytes they handled. It is *your* responsibility to call them "
"again until your message has been completely dealt with."
msgstr ""

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:160
msgid ""
"When a ``recv`` returns 0 bytes, it means the other side has closed (or is "
"in the process of closing) the connection.  You will not receive any more "
"data on this connection. Ever.  You may be able to send data successfully; "
"I'll talk more about this later."
msgstr ""

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:165
msgid ""
"A protocol like HTTP uses a socket for only one transfer. The client sends a "
"request, then reads a reply.  That's it. The socket is discarded. This means "
"that a client can detect the end of the reply by receiving 0 bytes."
msgstr ""

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:169
msgid ""
"But if you plan to reuse your socket for further transfers, you need to "
"realize that *there is no* :abbr:`EOT (End of Transfer)` *on a socket.* I "
"repeat: if a socket ``send`` or ``recv`` returns after handling 0 bytes, the "
"connection has been broken.  If the connection has *not* been broken, you "
"may wait on a ``recv`` forever, because the socket will *not* tell you that "
"there's nothing more to read (for now).  Now if you think about that a bit, "
"you'll come to realize a fundamental truth of sockets: *messages must either "
"be fixed length* (yuck), *or be delimited* (shrug), *or indicate how long "
"they are* (much better), *or end by shutting down the connection*. The "
"choice is entirely yours, (but some ways are righter than others)."
msgstr ""

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:180
msgid ""
"Assuming you don't want to end the connection, the simplest solution is a "
"fixed length message::"
msgstr ""

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:217
msgid ""
"The sending code here is usable for almost any messaging scheme - in Python "
"you send strings, and you can use ``len()`` to determine its length (even if "
"it has embedded ``\\0`` characters). It's mostly the receiving code that "
"gets more complex. (And in C, it's not much worse, except you can't use "
"``strlen`` if the message has embedded ``\\0``\\ s.)"
msgstr ""

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:223
msgid ""
"The easiest enhancement is to make the first character of the message an "
"indicator of message type, and have the type determine the length. Now you "
"have two ``recv``\\ s - the first to get (at least) that first character so "
"you can look up the length, and the second in a loop to get the rest. If you "
"decide to go the delimited route, you'll be receiving in some arbitrary "
"chunk size, (4096 or 8192 is frequently a good match for network buffer "
"sizes), and scanning what you've received for a delimiter."
msgstr ""

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:231
msgid ""
"One complication to be aware of: if your conversational protocol allows "
"multiple messages to be sent back to back (without some kind of reply), and "
"you pass ``recv`` an arbitrary chunk size, you may end up reading the start "
"of a following message. You'll need to put that aside and hold onto it, "
"until it's needed."
msgstr ""

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:237
msgid ""
"Prefixing the message with its length (say, as 5 numeric characters) gets "
"more complex, because (believe it or not), you may not get all 5 characters "
"in one ``recv``. In playing around, you'll get away with it; but in high "
"network loads, your code will very quickly break unless you use two ``recv`` "
"loops - the first to determine the length, the second to get the data part "
"of the message. Nasty. This is also when you'll discover that ``send`` does "
"not always manage to get rid of everything in one pass. And despite having "
"read this, you will eventually get bit by it!"
msgstr ""

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:246
msgid ""
"In the interests of space, building your character, (and preserving my "
"competitive position), these enhancements are left as an exercise for the "
"reader. Lets move on to cleaning up."
msgstr ""

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:252
msgid "Binary Data"
msgstr ""

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:254
msgid ""
"It is perfectly possible to send binary data over a socket. The major "
"problem is that not all machines use the same formats for binary data. For "
"example, a Motorola chip will represent a 16 bit integer with the value 1 as "
"the two hex bytes 00 01. Intel and DEC, however, are byte-reversed - that "
"same 1 is 01 00. Socket libraries have calls for converting 16 and 32 bit "
"integers - ``ntohl, htonl, ntohs, htons`` where \"n\" means *network* and \"h"
"\" means *host*, \"s\" means *short* and \"l\" means *long*. Where network "
"order is host order, these do nothing, but where the machine is byte-"
"reversed, these swap the bytes around appropriately."
msgstr ""

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:264
msgid ""
"In these days of 32 bit machines, the ascii representation of binary data is "
"frequently smaller than the binary representation. That's because a "
"surprising amount of the time, all those longs have the value 0, or maybe 1. "
"The string \"0\" would be two bytes, while binary is four. Of course, this "
"doesn't fit well with fixed-length messages. Decisions, decisions."
msgstr ""

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:272
msgid "Disconnecting"
msgstr ""

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:274
msgid ""
"Strictly speaking, you're supposed to use ``shutdown`` on a socket before "
"you ``close`` it.  The ``shutdown`` is an advisory to the socket at the "
"other end. Depending on the argument you pass it, it can mean \"I'm not "
"going to send anymore, but I'll still listen\", or \"I'm not listening, good "
"riddance!\".  Most socket libraries, however, are so used to programmers "
"neglecting to use this piece of etiquette that normally a ``close`` is the "
"same as ``shutdown(); close()``.  So in most situations, an explicit "
"``shutdown`` is not needed."
msgstr ""

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:282
msgid ""
"One way to use ``shutdown`` effectively is in an HTTP-like exchange. The "
"client sends a request and then does a ``shutdown(1)``. This tells the "
"server \"This client is done sending, but can still receive.\"  The server "
"can detect \"EOF\" by a receive of 0 bytes. It can assume it has the "
"complete request.  The server sends a reply. If the ``send`` completes "
"successfully then, indeed, the client was still receiving."
msgstr ""

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:289
msgid ""
"Python takes the automatic shutdown a step further, and says that when a "
"socket is garbage collected, it will automatically do a ``close`` if it's "
"needed. But relying on this is a very bad habit. If your socket just "
"disappears without doing a ``close``, the socket at the other end may hang "
"indefinitely, thinking you're just being slow. *Please* ``close`` your "
"sockets when you're done."
msgstr ""

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:297
msgid "When Sockets Die"
msgstr ""

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:299
msgid ""
"Probably the worst thing about using blocking sockets is what happens when "
"the other side comes down hard (without doing a ``close``). Your socket is "
"likely to hang. TCP is a reliable protocol, and it will wait a long, long "
"time before giving up on a connection. If you're using threads, the entire "
"thread is essentially dead. There's not much you can do about it. As long as "
"you aren't doing something dumb, like holding a lock while doing a blocking "
"read, the thread isn't really consuming much in the way of resources. Do "
"*not* try to kill the thread - part of the reason that threads are more "
"efficient than processes is that they avoid the overhead associated with the "
"automatic recycling of resources. In other words, if you do manage to kill "
"the thread, your whole process is likely to be screwed up."
msgstr ""

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:313
msgid "Non-blocking Sockets"
msgstr ""

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:315
msgid ""
"If you've understood the preceding, you already know most of what you need "
"to know about the mechanics of using sockets. You'll still use the same "
"calls, in much the same ways. It's just that, if you do it right, your app "
"will be almost inside-out."
msgstr ""

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:320
msgid ""
"In Python, you use ``socket.setblocking(0)`` to make it non-blocking. In C, "
"it's more complex, (for one thing, you'll need to choose between the BSD "
"flavor ``O_NONBLOCK`` and the almost indistinguishable Posix flavor "
"``O_NDELAY``, which is completely different from ``TCP_NODELAY``), but it's "
"the exact same idea. You do this after creating the socket, but before using "
"it. (Actually, if you're nuts, you can switch back and forth.)"
msgstr ""

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:327
msgid ""
"The major mechanical difference is that ``send``, ``recv``, ``connect`` and "
"``accept`` can return without having done anything. You have (of course) a "
"number of choices. You can check return code and error codes and generally "
"drive yourself crazy. If you don't believe me, try it sometime. Your app "
"will grow large, buggy and suck CPU. So let's skip the brain-dead solutions "
"and do it right."
msgstr ""

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:334
msgid "Use ``select``."
msgstr ""

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:336
msgid ""
"In C, coding ``select`` is fairly complex. In Python, it's a piece of cake, "
"but it's close enough to the C version that if you understand ``select`` in "
"Python, you'll have little trouble with it in C::"
msgstr ""

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:347
msgid ""
"You pass ``select`` three lists: the first contains all sockets that you "
"might want to try reading; the second all the sockets you might want to try "
"writing to, and the last (normally left empty) those that you want to check "
"for errors. You should note that a socket can go into more than one list. "
"The ``select`` call is blocking, but you can give it a timeout. This is "
"generally a sensible thing to do - give it a nice long timeout (say a "
"minute) unless you have good reason to do otherwise."
msgstr ""

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:355
msgid ""
"In return, you will get three lists. They contain the sockets that are "
"actually readable, writable and in error. Each of these lists is a subset "
"(possibly empty) of the corresponding list you passed in."
msgstr ""

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:359
msgid ""
"If a socket is in the output readable list, you can be as-close-to-certain-"
"as-we-ever-get-in-this-business that a ``recv`` on that socket will return "
"*something*. Same idea for the writable list. You'll be able to send "
"*something*. Maybe not all you want to, but *something* is better than "
"nothing.  (Actually, any reasonably healthy socket will return as writable - "
"it just means outbound network buffer space is available.)"
msgstr ""

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:366
msgid ""
"If you have a \"server\" socket, put it in the potential_readers list. If it "
"comes out in the readable list, your ``accept`` will (almost certainly) "
"work. If you have created a new socket to ``connect`` to someone else, put "
"it in the potential_writers list. If it shows up in the writable list, you "
"have a decent chance that it has connected."
msgstr ""

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:372
msgid ""
"Actually, ``select`` can be handy even with blocking sockets. It's one way "
"of determining whether you will block - the socket returns as readable when "
"there's something in the buffers.  However, this still doesn't help with the "
"problem of determining whether the other end is done, or just busy with "
"something else."
msgstr ""

#: ../Doc/howto/sockets.rst:377
msgid ""
"**Portability alert**: On Unix, ``select`` works both with the sockets and "
"files. Don't try this on Windows. On Windows, ``select`` works with sockets "
"only. Also note that in C, many of the more advanced socket options are done "
"differently on Windows. In fact, on Windows I usually use threads (which "
"work very, very well) with my sockets."
msgstr ""
